Start with something to prove.
Make it yours. Click to type.
A rematch. A new bet.
As many times as you want.
Your clip and your agreed terms give the AI a place to start. It follows what happened, checks what counts, and explains the call.
Trusting AI’s advice is one thing. Accepting its ruling when it costs you money is another. That trust has to be earned in the open.
Betting markets offer wagers on scheduled events and settle them using published results and statistics. Your one-on-one, trick shot, or speed run has neither a listed market nor an official result. People still bet on them. They just have to argue about what happened. Wayger gives those challenges a way to settle: you define the claim, both sides agree on what counts, and AI judges the video against those terms.
“AI is biased” is a fair challenge. Calling it neutral doesn’t answer it. Wayger asks the AI to apply the same agreed criteria to the same evidence, whoever comes out ahead. Its timestamped observation log shows what it saw and how it reached the verdict, so both sides can check the work. Neutrality has to show up in the calls.
One clip is all it takes.
Something happening right now. Both sides in on it. One clean take that gives the judge something real to go on.
A little inspiration for your next “bet you can’t.”
“I'll hold a plank longer than you.”
“I can do 50 burpees in under 3:00.”
“I'll jump rope 100 times with 3 tricks and no trips.”
“I have a faster 40-yard dash than you.”
“I can do more pull-ups than you.”
“I'll guess our checkout total within $2.”
“I'll grab everything on this 6-item grocery list in 3:40.”
“I can land a water bottle flip first try.”
“I'll beat you at rock paper scissors, best of 5.”
“The Starbucks barista will spell my name right, no spelling it out.”
“I can get 3 strangers to high five me in 1 minute.”
“I'll hit 3 threes in a row.”
“I can juggle a soccer ball 25 times.”
“I'll drive a ball 250+ at Topgolf.”
“I'll beat you 11 to 5 or better in pickleball.”
“I'll beat you 1 on 1. I'm receiver, you're DB.”
“I'll get today's Wordle in 3 guesses or less.”
“I'll land within 500 miles on one GeoGuessr round.”
“I'll guess the year of any song you play within 2 years.”
“I can multiply any two 2-digit numbers in my head in under 10 seconds.”
“I can name more countries than you in 60 seconds.”
A bottle flip. Ten clean push-ups. Who blinked first. Start with something happening now that one video can show, and agree on what counts before you film.
No. A challenge, a dare, or a disagreement is enough. You and the other person decide what you're putting to the judge.
Wayger is free at launch, and Wayger takes no fee. If your challenge involves money, both people agree on the amount before filming.
You record in Wayger, in the moment. The judge gets one continuous take of the challenge you both agreed to.
You can inspect what the AI observed and the criteria it checked. If both people agree the call is wrong, a good faith override lets you change the outcome together.
The moment has to be observable, and the criteria have to be clear. If the video doesn't give the AI enough evidence, the result can be inconclusive. A matter of taste needs more than a camera.
WaygerLeave your email. We'll let you know when Wayger is ready.
